gwyneth colleen photography » portland, or wedding photographer

beantown, baby. (+ etc.)

on easter, i went to a sunrise service. the pastor had said the week before…”this is the latest sunrise you’ll ever have for easter, 6:30…” i figured i could probably manage that, and then i could forever remember the one year i got up to watch the sunrise on easter…and therefore sleep in without guilt. so, 6:30 found me joining a shivering throng down by the great bay near portsmouth. it was COLD that morning, and the service was short and kind of uninspiring, overall, until i got to go over by the water w/ my camera.


(i deliberately defocused this one…i wanted the softness and tranquility to shine through.) i like it.


(this photo was processed using a colour preset developed by my friend rachel @ mergeweddings.com

================================================================then, last monday i got a call…

“we’re hangin’ out in boston this evening, if you wanna come join us for dinner.”

oh. well, i kinda did…but, that wasn’t much notice! but i rearranged my schedule and made it work. (thank you, tim gunn.)

i got there and found parking right away. (on the common/public gardens, no less!) the group i was chillin’ with included an out-of-town guest experiencing boston for the first time, so…of course we had to walk the red line. the old state house never fails to amuse/endear itself to me…i love seeing how little and old it looks in the midst of the bustling modern metropolis. charming.

but then i had to go back and feed the meter. (fyi: meters on the common go till 8pm, not 6. poo.) on the way back, i spied this incredible alley, and made amy pose for me…um, yeah. she looked fierce.

and…i liked the outfit i was wearing, so i told her to grab a few shots of me, too…but, uh…it was COLD. dang, gina!


[also…my hair had been in a ponytail, and it totally looked better up…:(]


(this isn’t really in focus, but it’s too funny not to share. elsewhere, i captioned it, “i met someone yesterday…at a park. some people might say he’s a little cold…a little stiff…but he just kept looking right at me.” hee hee.)


we ended our evening at finale. the desserts were very pretty, but…i wasn’t AWED by their awesomeness…it was a very nice place, and we had a 1.5 year old with us wanting to shove her fingers into the pretty coloured chocolate confections…and we we were windblown and had been walking around the city all evening. i think i enjoyed our tide-us-over cannoli from mike’s more. (and they were certainly more affordable, too!)

back to Topget in touchshare on facebookemail to friend
Christine2 April 2008 - 12:02

The Old State House is one of my all time favorite places. I just adore Boston.

Hmm… can I figure out a way to get you to send me some marzipan from Mike’s? I’m not a cannoli girl, but that marzipan is the BEST. (I would also like some Regina’s from the North End, but I think that might be cold and sort of nasty by the time it gets here.)

rachel3 April 2008 - 23:06

nice use of the preset, hot stuff.

you get what you pay for

so, i was clickin’ around craigslist today. (woo, craigslist! found me the last few apartments i’ve lived in.)

i saw this ad for wedding photography, and i’m not going to lie…it lit quite a fire in my gut. i was so tempted to email him, but instead, i am going to post my rant here, because i’m sure some of you have had those exact same thoughts before. why does photography cost SO DANG MUCH? it’s just someone pointing a camera at me! anyone can do that. they certainly shouldn’t charge $xxx/hr for it.

well.

1. NOT anyone can do it. it does take creativity, practice, and a certain inborn “quality” to be able to take striking photographs. i’m sure you’ve seen pictures that did absolutely nothing for you…the person behind the camera didn’t “see” the world as a photographer does, and it showed! (of course, that person may be an amazing guitar player, a wicked accountant who saves people money left and right, a savvy web programmer makin’ the internets hott…)

2. equipment. cameras cost money. lots of money. so do lenses, flashes, memory, software for processing photos, etc, etc…a responsible professional will have extras of important things so if a camera starts to malfunction…it’s ok! he/she’s got another one. you’ll likely never even know if something like that goes wrong if your photographer is a professional.

3. insurance. professionals also carry insurance. i do.

4. time. let me just type out a (paraphrased) dialogue had between my most favourite new clients ever nicki (who is a photographer!) and her intended, shane. (hi guys!) (he’s a marine fighter pilot…their wedding’s gonna be SO. AWESOME!)
shane: she charges $x,xxx. for 6 hours of work! you could do that! think of how much you could contribute to this household if you just started working one day a week!
nicki: you think she’s DONE after the wedding? SHANE–she’s going to go home and spend the ENTIRE WEEK working on those photos!

she’s right…when all’s said and done, i spend at least 40 hours on each wedding. there’s lots of prep work/customer service time, and for each hour i spend shooting, i spend at LEAST 3 in front of the computer.

5. education. professionals make sure they are investing in their craft…they spend time talking shop with other professionals, time shooting and trying out new techniques, time educating themselves whether in an actual classroom (check) or reading periodicals/articles on the internet/books (check).

6. advertising/infrastructure. specifically website and proofing platforms. it costs money to be able to provide that convenience to clients! but it is a definite requirement in doing business in today’s market.

7. it’s a business. a job. a hobbyist who pays his rent by working a 9-5 and then shoots weddings on the weekend may be able to afford suggesting that $700 for 4 hours is outrageous, but consider that as someone’s entire livelihood…a skilled worker who is spending an entire work-week’s worth of hours working for you! wouldn’t you be frustrated if someone didn’t value your work?

i’m sure you’ve also wondered, “why does it cost extra for the disc of images?” well…historically, photographers kept the negatives and earned most of their profit on the back end, from print sales. that model is shifting a bit, and there are so many other media options…specifically the internet. i understand that you want 1) the option of putting YOUR photos on facebook/myspace/your blog/emailing them to your grandmother in missouri/etc, 2) the peace of mind of knowing you HAVE those full-resolution files in your possession. that is why i make them available for you to purchase…i definitely think it’s a reasonable request. why aren’t they just included? because they have value! every single photo that clients see has been selected by me and received a little bit of TLC. (and, also…let’s face it…if someone purchases the disc, the likelihood that i’m going to sell any prints goes way down, so that loss has to be recouped somehow!)
if you have any questions at all about the way this stuff works, please don’t hesitate to ask. i used to have a lot of the same questions, and it’s amazing how much more clear everything seems to me now that i’m on the other side of the lens! 😀

back to Topget in touchshare on facebookemail to friend
Sarah19 March 2008 - 14:14

Amen, sister.

Nicki (new favorite client)19 March 2008 - 17:25

I’m going to bookmark this response and read it everytime I get frustrated (which is everytime I watch an HBO series featuring another high school reject character that picks up a camera one day and is professionally shooting fashion by the next episode). They make it look to easy…any idiot can be a pro….arrrr (makes me shake)

gwyn19 March 2008 - 17:31

hahaha, totally, nicki!

jess19 March 2008 - 21:16

I wanted to add an “Amen sister” too! 🙂 You rock.

olivestar19 March 2008 - 22:44

I wish I could email this to all of my clients. Well put! You are my hero today 😀

Julia20 March 2008 - 10:44

I try to stay away from shooting weddings but the points you’ve made carry over to other disciplines of the business. Like any other field, photography is a business and there’s demand out there. We can’t live on 200/wedding. That’s a joke. I loved your breakdown blog and will definitely refer to it in the future.
Best,
Julia

Dorie24 March 2008 - 13:56

Right on! I hate when I see ads like this on Craigslist. As you look at these ads, 9 times out of 10 they do not have a website or any sort of proof of their photographic knowledge!

Ashley O'Dell24 March 2008 - 20:04

“$700 just for 4 hours and all you get is a cd from which to print all your own pictures from.” That’s a steal!

Thanks for posting this, we’re all there with ya.

[…] found this blog post about why it’s wise to not skimp on wedding photography. Thank you, Gwyneth, for posting such […]